On Certain Fallacies (Part 1)

On Certain Fallacies (Part 1)

IN the January number of this Magazine I attempted to show that flesh-eating is not in accordance with the dictates of morality or good taste. In the present paper I wish to meet some of the stock arguments that are most commonly advanced by the opponents of Food Reform, and to prove in each case that for those who are once convinced of the desirability of a Vegetarian diet, there is no insuperable difficulty in carrying their wishes into practical effect. In nine cases out of ten it will be found that these objections to Vegetarianism are based on no solid and rational grounds, but rather on some half-dozen prejudices which have taken deep root in the British mind, and are in one form or another continually reappearing. I am aware that in refuting these time-honoured fallacies, I am only going over ground which has already been repeatedly traversed. But as long as our opponents persist in advancing the same arguments, we Vegetarians may be pardoned for reproducing the same replies.

H. S. Salt

The Food Reform Magazine, Vol. 1 No. 4, April 1882, pp. 105-111

Download: On Certain Fallacies (Part 1) (pdf)

Close Menu